Ubuntu 11.10 Release Schedule

Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) is scheduled for release Oct 13, 2011. It will mark the 15th release of Ubuntu. It has come a long way since the early days.

Here’s the rest of the Ubuntu 11.10 release schedule.

  • June 2nd, 2011 – Alpha 1 release
  • July 7th, 2011 – Alpha 2 release
  • August 4th, 2011 – Alpha 3 release
  • September 1st, 2011 – Beta 1 release
  • September 22nd, 2011 – Beta 2 release
  • October 13th, 2011 – Final release of Ubuntu 11.10

Install Firefox 5 On Ubuntu 11.04

Waiting for Canonical to update Mozilla Firefox with your latest Ubuntu release may take a very long time. Are you tired of waiting? Take action. Install Firefox 5 now. Why continue to run Firefox 3.6 if you can get Firefox 5 now? Firefox has sped up their development. It’s time for Canonical to match the Firefox releases. The following instructions will install the latest stable Firefox release to your current Ubuntu distribution. The current Ubuntu release is 11.04 Natty Narwhal. The current Firefox release is Firefox 5. By the way, I’m still running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and the instructions worked. This will also work for Ubuntu 10.10.

From the Terminal, run the following commands:

$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get upgrade

This will also update when Firefox 6 and Firefox 7 are released in the future.

Could Chrome Replace Firefox in Ubuntu

Reports have been confirmed that Firefox performance in Linux is considerably slower than in Windows or the Mac. So, why is Firefox performance slow in Linux? It seems to be a matter of priority. Less priority that is. Firefox developers have been focused on Windows, addressing issues where the majority of Firefox users are based.

Mozilla seemed to place less emphasis on Linux development. Mozilla is aware of these issues and are trying to fix them. Potentially, Canonical can replace Firefox with Chrome if performance continuous to be perceived as slow. Mozilla can potentially lose millions of dollars if this were to happen.

Mozilla receives millions of dollars from Google for making Google Search the default search engine for Firefox in Ubuntu. The growth of Firefox have slowed down considerably as Chrome continues to eat away the browser market share. I wouldn’t be surprised if Chrome becomes the default browser in the future, not only because of performance, but because it makes perfect sense.

After all, the Chrome browser is the centerpiece of the Chrome OS.

Funny Ubuntu Codenames

Canonical has released 14 Ubuntu distributions over the years. It started with Warty Warthog , followed by Hoary Hedgehog and Breezy Badger. Canonical switched to alphabetical order starting with Dapper Drake, then Edgy Eft, Feisty Fawn, Gutsy Gibbon, Hardy Heron, Gutsy Gibbon, Intrepid Ibex, Jaunty Jackalope, Karmic Koala, Lucid Lynx, and currently Maverick Meerkat. Canonical has already announced the next two releases, Natty Narwhal  and Oneiric Ocelot.

Although Canonical has done well in choosing its codenames over the years, it sure did miss out on some really funny ones. As most of you are aware, Ubuntu codenames are comprised of animals preceded by adjectives that start with the same letter. So, here’s my list of what could have been Ubuntu codenames.

What Could Have Been Codenames

  • A – Arrogant Ass
  • B – Babbling Baboon
  • C – Cocky Cobra
  • D – Dreadful Donkey
  • E – Earthly Earthworm
  • F – Flustered Flounder
  • G – Grumpy Gecko
  • H – Hideous Hyena
  • I – Icy Iguana
  • J – Jittery Jackrabbit
  • K – Killer Komodo
  • L – Loyal Leech
  • M – Magnetic Mosquito
  • N – Nerdy Nautilus
  • O – Orgasmic Orca

Future Codenames

  • P – Plumpy Penguin
  • Q – Quirky Quail
  • R – Raunchy Rabbit
  • S – Sexy Skunk
  • T – Tacky Tadpole
  • U – Ugly Urchin
  • V – Venomous Viper
  • W – Wretched Weasel
  • Y – Yackety Yak
  • Z – Zany Zebra

What’s yours? Any suggestions?

The Ubuntu Font

If you have visited Ubuntu’s website lately, you may have noticed the font being used. It’s called the Ubuntu font. See sample below. Canonical plans to release the Ubuntu font as open-source. Mark Shuttleworth talks about the font development in detail in his blog. If you haven’t been to the Ubuntu site lately, check it out. Also, Betatype has released an Ubuntu titling font. It’s not open source.

Washington Post Reviews Ubuntu 10.04

Ubuntu 10.04 is getting publicity not just from tech blogs and tech magazines, but also from mainstream media such as the Washington Post. It’s not the first time that a major newspaper like the Post has printed an article about Ubuntu. Apparently, the same author reviewed Ubuntu 6.06 several years back. Certainly, any exposure of Ubuntu to non-techie readers is a welcome change.

It’s great seeing different perspectives of Ubuntu. Here are a couple of quotes from Rob Pegoraro’s article from the Washington Post.

Linux may run TiVo video recorders and live inside Android phones, in addition to running much of the Internet’s servers, but it still lags on home PCs.

Will that change anytime soon? A new version of a consumer-oriented edition of Linux, Ubuntu (http://ubuntu.com), offers hope for Linux optimists but leaves room for doubters, too.

A fair assessment. The author continues.

Ubuntu does not, however, include the junk that’s standard issue on new Windows PCs, such as expiring trial versions or pushy security utilities. Neither can it run any Windows viruses, trojans, spyware or worms.

This has always been the biggest selling point of Ubuntu.

But Ubuntu also leaves out two things Windows users rightly expect: built-in support for common media file formats and all their computer’s parts.

To me, this is the biggest shortfall of Ubuntu. It’s the constant tinkering to make Ubuntu work with proprietary media file formats. To Linux purists, a distro release with non-proprietary software is the only choice. To most users, they just want a system that works with less tinkering, and less reading of forums to find solutions.

Compared with Windows XP and 7, Ubuntu 10.04 booted up and shut down much faster. But it needed more time to sleep and wake up and fell far short in battery life. With the screen kept on, two Web pages refreshing themselves and a music library playing, the Dell ran for two hours and 25 minutes in Linux, 23 minutes less than in XP. In the same test, the Sony lasted just under three hours in Ubuntu — but ran for another 80 minutes in Win 7.

This is another area Ubuntu can do better with regards to the battery life.

Overall, this is great exposure of Ubuntu. I’m hoping to see more articles as Ubuntu becomes more mainstream.

Canonical Plugins Explained

What exactly is Canonical Plugins? WordPress.org explains

Canonical plugins would be plugins that are community developed (multiple developers, not just one person) and address the most popular functionality requests with superlative execution. These plugins would be GPL and live in the WordPress.org repo, and would be developed in close connection with WordPress core. There would be a very strong relationship between core and these plugins that ensured that a) the plugin code would be secure and the best possible example of coding standards, and b) that new versions of WordPress would be tested against these plugins prior to release to ensure compatibility. There would be a screen within the Plugins section of the WordPress admin to feature these canonical plugins as a kind of Editor’s Choice or Verified guarantee. These plugins would be a true extension of core WordPress in terms of compatibility, security and support.